Interesting.

So the guy who is a stickler for boring grammar and is called a bot a lot ends up being cited as not Ai-influenced by the tool.

I would have expected that my strictness and rather uniform way of typing would have at least tripped something as a false-positive or returned results with a high percentage of AI influence probability.

Guess not. Wonder how it really decides such things, though, because I was at least half-sure it was going to be like "Yo beep-boop this guy's a clanker."

I checked both situations, posts you created such as mechanics/Recluse's gimmicks, normal replies in discussions solving doubts or pointing out cheaters.
Out of curiosity replies also related to the that individual.

None of these had traces of AI using the same tool i had linked in that discussion. I noticed the user who was flaming others his replies were often getting flagged as AI.

So i think this will be a good behavior to stick to, in upcoming weeks/months to double check any bait kind of post instead of seriously debating with AI.

Yeah, you're right sometimes i forget people tend to have their own personal agenda

It's a week, nothing to fuss about.

best of luck dealing with this, just hope it wasnt a perma ban

The only thing that bothers me is that the so-called "person" behind this is currently, as it seems, scot-free.

That will not do. If I'm going to bite a bullet, he's going to have to nibble on some of its parts too.

I'll see what I can do. Surely they won't admit that they are encouraging harassers on their own platform and having them as favorites to boot. Especially not if I have receipts of the entire situation just in case.