+ Scenarios. The map, although it has some large "empty zones", it his pretty well designed. The whole Nuka-World is a "Disneylandish" construction. There are castles, rollercoasters, zoo, amusement parks, and so on...
+ New enemies and Nuka-Cola Mixes. New recipes and a bunch of different nuka-colas.
+ Quests. The majority of the quests were fun to play. Do not confuse this with the story and writting... You'll understand why in cons.
+ Hours of gameplay. Its a pretty big DLC. I've seen shorter full games.

- Story, campaign... and the "bad" relation with the main game. Why would the developers/Writters/whatever make a story where everything seems to be bad decisions? Spoiler ahead... Why make players choose between the bad side, the worst side, or the evil side? Everything seemed a bad choice. I could actually lived with that, if "what happens in the DLC, stays in the DLC". But that's not the case. You have quests where you actually have to go to the commonwealth kinda ruining some of your side quests and relationships in the main game. Because, in nuka-world, each side you choose, is a bad side! Sure, you can always not choose anyone and start killing those damn raiders. But then... The DLC wouldn't make any sense to exist if you go there and kill everything... right?
- Expensive. 20€ is way too expensive.

- The choosing sides in this DLC are bad, but it still is fallout after all. Buy it on sale.

[h1]PROS[/h1] + [b]Scenarios[/b]. The map, although it has some large "empty zones", it his pretty well designed. The whole Nuka-World is a "Disneylandish" construction. There are castles, rollercoasters, zoo, amusement parks, and so on... + [b]New enemies and Nuka-Cola Mixes[/b]. New recipes and a bunch of different nuka-colas. + [b]Quests[/b]. The majority of the quests were fun to play. [b]Do not confuse this with the story and writting... You'll understand why in cons[/b]. + [b]Hours of gameplay[/b]. Its a pretty big DLC. I've seen shorter full games. [h1]CONS[/h1] - [b]Story, campaign... and the "bad" relation with the main game[/b]. Why would the developers/Writters/whatever make a story where everything seems to be bad decisions? Spoiler ahead... [spoiler]Why make players choose between the bad side, the worst side, or the evil side? Everything seemed a bad choice. I could actually lived with that, if "what happens in the DLC, stays in the DLC". But that's not the case. You have quests where you actually have to go to the commonwealth kinda ruining some of your side quests and relationships in the main game. Because, in nuka-world, each side you choose, is a bad side! Sure, you can always not choose anyone and start killing those damn raiders. But then... The DLC wouldn't make any sense to exist if you go there and kill everything... right? [/spoiler] - [b]Expensive[/b]. 20€ is way too expensive. [h1]OVERALL 6.5/10[/h1] - [i]The choosing sides in this DLC are bad, but it still is fallout after all. Buy it on sale.[/i]