Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem

Moderators
Yes this is definitely not centralizing on the idea of difficult games per se. The best easy games are conceived as such in their core-design, so nothing is really lost. The problem is bypassing the core-design for trivialization purposes, which doesn't differentiate between the initial difficulty design.
So we're rather against the postmodern (and sometimes intersectional) mentality that the player is entitled to control the game however they wish for, as this leads only to a decline of potential valuable videogame experiences.
basically, this group appears to be totally against assist modes and features as a blanket opinion, which i feel is rather unfair to the games you are reviewing and harming your credibility as a curator.
i'll stay in here for now, because it would be nice to see this group develop into something with a bit more nuance, but currently i offer no support.
(3/3)
(2/3)