Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem

Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
If that weren't bad enough, this guy goes on to undermine—or attempt to undermine—my whole program of transcendental philosophy. My approach depends on drawing a sharp distinction between our knowledge and the logical conditions that make that knowledge possible. Philosophy's concern is solely with the latter, with the attempt to specify in advance what we can know; that is how I save philosophy from engaging in endless, pointless speculation.
Did I mention I don't like Hegel very much?