Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem

Naples, Campania, Italy
223,537 ratings 


In comparison, Battlefield 2042’s movement was way too fast. This isn't an issue here.
In the current pre-alpha, all classes are open, but in the beta, there will be two modes:
One with class-restricted weapons, and a second one, in which all weapons are open to any class.
In my opinion, Battlefield works better when weapons are restricted by class.
Too many people want “modern” things, not realizing that’s exactly what has been ruining the franchise over the last unfortunate entries.
A military game should stay true to its military roots — not add made-up elements, just because someone wants to play that way, and go off the beaten path as a result. 1/5