Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem

Russian Federation



At the end of day, disagreements ultimately comes down to opinion differences, everyone adhere to sets of axioms that are not deductively proven but rather first principle premises that grounds one's deduction.
When someone is comparing something to something, it is being done for the sake of comparing the similarities, and not the differences.
Then the other person points out the differences, and further states that the similarities are become voided due to these differences.
I'll give you an example (1+1)=2. I have 2 oranges. But the other person says, "no, you don't have 2 oranges, because one is smaller than the other, and is a lighter shade of orange".
This is trivial, and it derails the purpose of the description to aid in defining the topic.
These concepts about evolutionary advantage can either be empirical claims or metaphysical and either cannot be verified nor are they relevant to moral and ethics. In addition, by the logic of evolutionary effectiveness, well, prokayrote cells are certainly optimized for that, they can reproduce rapidly as single cell organisms and survive in extreme conditions.
Have a great day! God bless you!