安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題


http://img810.imageshack.us/i/logo20.png/
Send me a message and let me know what you think.
Lots of engies is pointless. they're sacrificing movement and HP for immobile objects. Additionally, metal is limited and can't support 3 engies.
If they want to go engies, you have a spy and a demo and two soldiers, plus a heavy to tank the damage sufficiently.
pe ahs temp logo imma do my own rendition of it
Hmmm....
If I chose a class (like a spy), it would prevent others from selecting that class to become better at it. This will hinder growth in player's abiliities and cause our members to seek out less restricted servers or groups for development.
Got a 2nd reason why 1 class per team is a bad idea.
We already have 50 + members. Having 1 class per team would mean only 9 max per team (18 people max per game). What if we have a full house and have 15 vs 15? It would be unfair for people to sit out on a game and this will ulitmately hinder the development of this group.