The best I've managed is 250 cycles, but the high scores say a few got it somewhere between 150 and 200. Any hints for optimization? My best attempt writes the last 30 directly rather than using a loop (note: 50 size limit on level): LINK 800 GRAB 200 ADDI F 1 X WIPE LINK 800 MAKE TEST X > 30 FJMP LOW SUBI X 30 T MARK LOOP SUBI T 1 T ADDI T 30 F TJMP LOOP @REP 30 COPY @{29,-1} F @END HALT MARK LOW COPY X T MARK LOOP2 SUBI T 1 T COPY T F TJMP LOOP2 ...

Hey everyone! I can only assume this game will have friends-list based histograms again, so here's a "share your steam username" post again. I'll start. :) Add me at ccwluter on steam!

hello fellow exapunks. over the past few months I have discovered an interesting pattern amongst level solutions: the most optimized solutions for any level will have a size less than half of the target size, and, the size will be an even number. this has led me down a rabbit hole of redesigning my solutions and even led me to a new style of solution design that i call: mobius looping. mobius looping is a method where you create an open ended loop that lets the control flow feed into another loop seamlessl...

I don't play a programming/hacking game to play solitaire. 10 would've been fine, 25 wins would've been extremely annoying, 50 would've been rage inducing, 100 is just like...... I don't even know man. WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY EDIT: the true horror is the other minigame...

Reviews say this is a pretty challenging programming simulator. Is it difficult all the way through, or does it start easy with a steep difficulty curve? Are players expected to read the manual often and rely on it, or is it just bonus content? Would you recommend this to non-programmers or recommend something more beginner-friendly like Opus Magnum or One Dreamer?...