Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem

California, United States
facility, 12-15 parolees lived, on a rotational basis until they could be placed into more permanent locations
within the community. How would you feel? Do you think the Department of Corrections should warn people
about such facilities? What steps should be considered when establishing a community based corrections
facility?
2. Name and describe five technologies that have helped the Department of Corrections keep track of subjects on
parole.
3. What obligation does the State or Department of Corrections have in reintegrating parolees into the
community? What are the pros and cons of such efforts?