WARNING: I believe most of the negative reviews are either due to the person(s) not understanding the authors' intentions or too narrow and circumstantial. But it is a VERY short game.

I played through all of the endings in about 15 minutes. The game does a good job of describing itself and it's pros and cons. It's very self aware, and I like that. The author was clearly trying to be as informative as possible to the end user of it's objective, but also it's consequences.

And even though I have to agree that "Gatekeeping", especially in a country with such systemic hatred of 'the individual', needs to be curbed. But i still believe that some sort of oversight needs to happen, not in it's current moto of "Protecting people from themselves", but perhaps a moto of; "Empower others with confidence, through personal introspection and information" The more confident and concrete ones convictions, the happier and stabler an individual they will be.

Some of the questions are certainly vital and will make someone uncomfortable, but that's the point. Transitioning isn't comfortable and if you don't answer some of these questions, it may seriously turn out botched.


"Ideal Body"=keep expectations within reality. "What was the event in your life that made you think, alright I have to do this"=Ensures that the patient has a good grasp of themselves

That being said, a LOT of the questions that were asked and are commonly asked are so irrelevant or are answered by the patients raison d'etre for therapy


("What's your sexuality?"= gender != sexuality and rarely have anything to do with a patients reason to transition, "Growing up did you like boyish things or girlish things"= rhetorical or just not relevant to the ADULT that sits before you)

[i]WARNING:[/i] I believe most of the negative reviews are either due to the person(s) not understanding the authors' intentions or too narrow and circumstantial. But it is a VERY short game. I played through all of the endings in about 15 minutes. The game does a good job of describing itself and it's pros and cons. It's very self aware, and I like that. The author was clearly trying to be as informative as possible to the end user of it's objective, but also it's consequences. And even though I have to agree that "Gatekeeping", especially in a country with such systemic hatred of 'the individual', needs to be curbed. But i still believe that some sort of oversight needs to happen, not in it's current moto of "Protecting people from themselves", but perhaps a moto of; "Empower others with confidence, through personal introspection and information" The more confident and concrete ones convictions, the happier and stabler an individual they will be. Some of the questions are certainly vital and will make someone uncomfortable, but that's the point. Transitioning isn't comfortable and if you don't answer some of these questions, it may seriously turn out botched. [spoiler] "Ideal Body"=keep expectations within reality. "What was the event in your life that made you think, alright I have to do this"=Ensures that the patient has a good grasp of themselves [/spoiler] That being said, a LOT of the questions that were asked and are commonly asked are so irrelevant or are answered by the patients raison d'etre for therapy [spoiler] ("What's your sexuality?"= gender != sexuality and rarely have anything to do with a patients reason to transition, "Growing up did you like boyish things or girlish things"= rhetorical or just not relevant to the ADULT that sits before you) [/spoiler]