A warning for all of you planning to go into stunt linguistics: I don't care what your passions are, do not overlap yourself with the field of mad science, that is reckless and dangerous.

To make but one example of the conundrum: walking the talk, and flies without wings. Both of those things are well and dandy in either stunt linguistics or mad science alone, but combining them however is.. well the horror cant be described succinctly. So I will opt instead for a verbose demonstration of the practice for educational purposes.

In stunt linguistics we would call a fly without wings, a walk. In mad science we would call a fly with wings quite an ideal canvass. In mad linguistic science we create a fly with no wings, call it a walk, and *recklessly* ***incomprehensibly*** decide that the walk should talk. Rather quickly a simple phrase such as "walk the talk" gets perverted into things mankind should never do. A talking fly without wings has no reason to exist and no value to anyone but the person delluded enough to combine these fields of practice.

Please take my warning to heart, and if anyone knows where I can buy unregulated gene splicing equipment and bulk maggots please let me know.