Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem

United States
2. The production of animal products inherently causes suffering to animals.
3. Animal products are generally unnecessary (for health or survival).
It is immoral to produce (or support the production of) animal products unless absolutely necessary. Or, to put that another way: If we can avoid harming animals, why wouldn't we?
Animal products are also absolutely devastating for the environment and bad for your health, while at the same time completely unnecessary. I'd argue it's immoral to support something so extremely harmful to the planet.