Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem

Baghdad, Iraq
From a set of data, 3eeeeer &=======> is able to establish a principle, or work out a rule, or suggest a reason for failure or success. Their analysis is usually accurate but not original. Applies professional experience and/or knowledge of people reasonably well to forecast outcomes with at least 60% accuracy. Usually defensive when efforts are criticised – but they nevertheless tries to learn from mistakes. 3eeeeer &=======> can copy reasonably accurately, but they does not produce their own ideas.
🐟 + 🐠 = 📒