Recent reviews by [TP]Scott

I just find games like this fun. I hope the developer adds more content to expand on the science. I love the idea I can save the world and be a villain in concept.

It's TES. End of Review.

I don't get some reviews. How can you have "P2W" in a free game with no multiplayer.. Downright insane take on it. If anything you could call it something else. However, it's fun that it can run next to another game, video, or other project. I can do things and still enjoy the game when I do take control.

Seriously.. the negative comments are a joke regarding monetization of a free game where the developer would like some coin to compensation for a Free Game. Now if it gets to an "IdleOn" level of greed, then yea this will be a huge negative.

For any game to throttle enjoyment/mechanics behind a paywall is crazy. This game is not there yet, and we can hope he never gets there.

Pass. But then again, I perfer FPS Games that aren't drowning in micro transactions.

Pass. All this to get on console..


Give me the option to turn off cross-play and give me back the grim dark this game once provided.

The game is indeed Early Access. However, It's worth supporting in my opinion, but you should judge for yourself.

To add though, it's important to ignore anyone talking about Epic. They fail to see how it's apart of the framework and helps with multiplayer. I've been seeing a lot of people freaking out about this and they're clearly "just a gamer".

It seems all the negatives are people who don't have the greatest builds, can't manage a good build, or can't get over Epic Games Services which is utilized for cross play. Ooo so scary to have a service that makes the community enlarged..

It's a solid game, and honestly judge for yourself not from a review. Play two hours and return, or keep it. It's really not that hard.

Plan to lose a life time of hours once 1.0 drops.

Anything less than two hours and I'd say a review isn't worth its salt. After ten hours of continuous game play and a wipe of my own choice not because I needed to, I've come to the following.

Yes, the game is the definition of an Early Access title. It has its pros and cons, bugs and faults. However, with all that these reviews are just our own opinions. I say take the plunge and try it for yourself to make the decision. You have a time window that you can play and return if you're dissatisfied and that’s exactly what you should utilize it for.


The developers wanted a longer development window and even utilized content creators for this and to showcase the game and development without bias in most cases. However, people complained (this was documented by many content creators and videos made) and so they obliged and released it in EA a bit earlier. Now those same people are crying over bugs and issues " I'm not a tester, I'm a player!".

I could list pros and cons, but many have done that. Some cared to put effort and check grammar and spelling, and just complained with less than an hour of play time. I’d rather you make the decision for yourself, yes the game takes a bit above average PC, yes they have corrected a few of the issues that caused performance issues on top tier GPUs/CPUs, you make experience bugs and issues. However, the discord and community alone is full of people who will try and help, and the developers are working effortlessly on fixes. This isn’t an ego stroke, this is factual and the source is seen in the Public Beta Testing section of the GZW discord.

I’m also not opposed to changing my review if I feel the development team strays away from what they originally proposed to the community, or fails to deliver and accept the financial loss if it occurs.

I could write a long formulated review. However, I'm not it's simple the game needs a lot of work. It's going to become one of those games that you'd end of picking back up in a few years after some serious work has been done.