2
Products
reviewed
0
Products
in account

Recent reviews by CantgetRight!!

Showing 1-2 of 2 entries
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
87.3 hrs on record (60.6 hrs at review time)
4 person Co-op was the drive behind giving Black-ops 3 a chance. So, I'll start with the campaign. When you play with friends I suggest you select at least verteran difaculty and if playing solo atleast Hardend. You'll be board if you don't. I've seen better story lines and it's by far the weakest yet in COD. The first 90% of the campaign is ok. Callenging and fun. I don't want to spoil it so I won't go into detail. Last 10% coupled with the weak story was almost unbearable to play through. It was unchallenging, even set on veteran, mind numbing, and pretty much a waste of time. So much so it went from a 4 out of 5 star rating to 11/2 star. yes it was that bad.

As, for multi-player well..... it's full of 1 shot kill weapons and special abilities.Weapons are unbalanced and the P2P match making service (my favorite o.O) is still garbage. There is little to no teamplay and playing the objective takes a distant second to corner camping for score streaks. I wasn't a fan of Advanced warfare and Bo3 isn't much differant. I really believe that less is more. COD4's multi-player put the franchise into everyones home. World at War and even MW2 (when p2p match making was introduced to PC) contributed to the franchises greatness. It's been all down hill from there. Now you bearly recognize Call of Duty at all. Is it halo?... is it unreal tornament?....Quake maybe? I guess it's just not the franchise for me anymore.
Posted 16 November, 2015. Last edited 16 November, 2015.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
10 people found this review helpful
3.0 hrs on record (1.5 hrs at review time)
I tried it dispite my better judgement. Problem is the game is just ok. There are tons of different game types but, with no -one really playing anything but, TDM and if your lucky a few in DOM you don't get to experiance the game and all it's options. Activisions peer to peer match making is still the biggest joke since it was introduced in MW2. PC versions of any fps multi-player needs dedicated servers. Players want a sense of security against hackers. Automated anti-cheat systems standing alone coupled with no ability to choose with whom and where you play is frustrating. It's like buying a car that your never allowed to drive. I would recommend waiting to see if the Dedicated servers that are "in the works" become a reality. If they don't put in dedicated servers don't waste your money. Just let COD finally die.

So, some time has past and Call of Halo: Bunnyhopping lagfare is still not supporting dedicated servers. Well they have dedicated servers......according to an artical I read this means that Activision has servers dedicated to only running this game with their unpresadented peer to peer match making system.....Ahem !!... Not really the discription I would have used but, marketing is marketing i guess. I think what disappoints me the most is I allowed myself to get suckered into buying another $60 pile of crap. I bought it digital down load so I don't even get to wipe my arse with the box. I found Black-ops 2 for $28 bucks ( the one COD game I didn't buy when it came out and wish I had) with all the map packs and enjoy it more than Ghosts/Advanced warfare put together.

If you own black-ops 2 re-install it. If you don't....then buy it. There are still more people playing it than AW.
Posted 30 November, 2014. Last edited 14 December, 2014.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
Showing 1-2 of 2 entries