Recent reviews by AzuStar

This game is actually pretty decent...but gameplay is from 1997.
PROS
+ Graphics is cute
+ Bloom in 2D!
+ Pixel Art
+ Fitting sounds
+ Wither-level medieval soundtrack
+ Lore
+ Puzzles
+ Furry game lol

CONS
- After completing the first level it was apparent things were not going to progress all too much, immediately went to research walkthrough and it indeed had like few unshockables throughout he entire game.
- Spyro/Crash Bandicoot tier games (which are great don't get me wrong, but like it is not 1997 outside)
- All stats that exist in the game really quickly: you have health. Yeah. That's it.
- UI is not the most apparent (how to move between stages, ah press enter, where it says that?)
- Pixelated text is 1 step too much.

If I had any patience to complete Spyro trilogy more than once, I might have given it more than 50 min. All and all will not refund and leave it bough to support dev.

Great game suprisingly, you build your own wand of fancy spells, but there are powerful outliers to the blance like crit/critdmg. If there were more build paths available I'd say this would be the go-to for a chill experience. This is a singleplayer and with the current gamedesign it would be practically unfit for coop because you replay campaign basically, but it is entertaining nonetheless.

It is ok, but there is like no automation at all.
I leave it good rating but, it is 6-7 hour gameplay.
A bit too much for the money.
Most recipes cannot be automated and you end up redoing a lot of same tasks over and over again.
Took me 7 hours to go through a short game-wide tutorial to understand that there is no automation at all. May be give it 3-4 patches before buying it.
3/5