Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem


war." And we are all familiar with the over-used and under-defined
phrase "the battle of the sexes." How ironic and confounding these two
phrases are when considered together. For in the proverbial "Battle of
the Sexes" we are faced with an unending and unwinnable war. Should
either "side" ever win the war, it would of necessity end the battle.
And, either by predication or consequence, the end of the battle of
the sexes would certainly be concomitant with the end of sex. In
short, the end of the world, as we know it. In other words, the Battle
of the Sexes will be with us until the end of the world. And at that
point, who will really give a damn! Most of us would likely choose to
greet the apocolypse in flagrante delicto anyhow.