So, this is dead? Wow.

Goodbye, warflak. ._.

As a final post before I go, it's been a daunting endeavor and I'm glad to have known you people. Now the road branches,one can merge with the fury of... Project Fury,or one can join my group in polishing and fixing a old classic. Thr choice is yours to make. Farewell to you all.

http://v1.steam.hlxgame.cc/groups/bf1942crp i've created a group meant to revive the bf1942 community. if anyone wants to help,they may join.

It's not fair you have to do everything,but I personally am in lottle position to help,and pretty much everyone else who might have a skill won't speak up. Project Fury is ahead of us by months. At this point,if something doesn't actually start,this group may as well be fused with them or made to join my own people.

I've started to actually put my time to use,you know. Crazy thing is once,i thought we could bring back battlefield p4f. They finished operation road rage and would have probably released it shortly after if they hadnt cancelled all production.

We just aren't doing anything anymore.

Well, I guess you're right, warflak. I still have P4F installed on my PC, all the sounds, meshes, textures, everything.

1942mods.com and {LINK REMOVED}https://battlelog.co/ have legitimate versions of BF1942 and BF2 respectively. Sadly,this community seems to have died off. I'm trying to revive a new one. If you are interested in this new endeavor,contact me for details.

Seems like it.

Hey speaking of,guys...are we in development hell?

Anyhow,I checked out the tools and they're extensive as hell. We could make models AND maps detailed as hell.

I mean VR is challenging enough as it is,how we going to implement it in a fps? The Brookhaven Experiment is one with a single gun,but like its difficult.

Oh, I see. Well I don't know about Real Virtuality. Frankly, this is the first time I heard about it. :)
And yes, VR would be a task I'd consider if we had a real dev team, and not just one lazy guy; namely: me.

VR would be amazing though, but I very much doubt a small team of devs would ever take on such a demanding feature :s

I mean how're we going to make this thing VR?

Not VR,Real Virtuality. The arma engine. It would add some more realism. Also,as I said,project reality got a version for arma 2.

I haven't been working extensively with the Source Engine so far, but I guess there are some tutorials out there. Virtual Reality should not be top priority (if there's ever something like 'development')

Also another suggestion is using real virtuality? I'm very familiar with it and project reality team made a arma 2 version.

Hey,I had a question about the source engine? I've used the sdk sparingly but I've got no clue how to like create stuff. What did you do?

Yeah, that's what I was talking about. There are some people willing to help, but that doesn't mean that they actually do have the time or skills required to help. It's not the lack of interest that makes this project die ... just the neglect. Even from me. I just don't feel like working on it alone.

Been nearly a month. The Source SDK was kind of weird to work with. Anyway,our peers at Project Fury have managed to make some progress in weapon models and maps. At the rate this thing slowed down,we'll have to figure something out sometime soon. We also should try and see who is actually doing things? We'll need some people who,y'know are actually contributing to a extent to the project

My site doesn't have much of a purpose. I use it to practice and might use it in the future as a sort of blog type thing if I'm ever bothered about doing that sort of thing.

Learn to code. http://imgur.com/gallery/VuKnN5P
I thought to share this. I'll give it a look and it may help others.

Out of curiosity what exactly is your website about? All you got is two posts and a quite entertaining replica of solitarie.

Alright, I'm subscribed to the comment thread here now (thought I was already). If I find the time I'll get a little more into C++ and try out an engine. Doesn't matter which, I'm unfamiliar with both (though I already have UE4 installed). No promises though, I'm more inspired developing my website these days.

Well I'm glad I got tommys attention. Also as I stated before, you need to get the community involved. As far as I know,you only released updates for the people here. We never really got a chance to actively participate. I have voiced this a few times now,so it shouldn't be new. Having the community to help us out will assist. And yes Tommy,this will be a challenge, but it's possible. GoldenEye was done with 8 people of which 6 never had worked with games. We have 100. We can succeed,we only need to double down.

Good to see you, Tommy.
So - the current release of UE4 won't let me open the map (it does open a map, but all there is is a table and two chairs, some sky-lighting and that's it.)
Anyway, if we were to create the game with the Source Engine it wouldn't matter either way, and I think there are more people who know how to work with it than with UE4. P4F didn't stand out for its realistic look either.

Any other opinions? Otherwise I'll just accept this idea and get SDK.

"Come back to the GW:Assault,Tommy."

I never left. Nothing's happening here and there's no one I can exchange ideas on how we're going to go about programming the game.

And remember: I've only done a tiny bit of C++ but I've never been bothered at settling down to understand the UE4 engine or any other library for that matter. I'm not entirely sure how tricky making this game will be but I can see it being quite a challenge that I'm not sure I'm up to yet.

Also: stop fighting. I'm offering whatever help I can to either project but I'm not going to contribute if all that's going on in the steam groups is whining and complaining.

Also,try to get back into contact with Tommy and pardus,or just let me help out more! This community needs to be more active and I'm trying to help make that happen.

Huh. That's not half bad. I'm trying to conserve memory and I already have the sdk installed. I just need to understand how to use it.

I'm going to reinstall Unreal Engine and check if the map is compatible. :)

I thought about something else, however.
What if I/we created the game on Steam's source engine? It would make greenlighting the game easier, the whole process of texturing and building would be easier, too and it would generally speed up the process. It's not about the looks, right? And I think most of the things I want to do are possible with the Source engine. Besides, it doesn't even look too bad.
Just want some opinions here.

322,5 that do anything?

Okay, I'm going to go right out and say it. How many of your people are actually active?

Is there any way we can see the map you've finished? I'd like to have a idea of what we're doing, so maybe others can assist.

I can imagine, warflak. :)

Hello. :D

hi

You have no idea how glad I am.

Alright you guys, stop it.

This project isn't dead, it's in a coma and I won't wake it up as long as I'm the only one working on it. I've barely created one map, and that's it. No animations, no programming, just a map.
I'll reconsider the kickstarter campaign, but I'll want to show off what we're doing, or else people won't be interested for long and they probably won't fund us either.
Founding my own indie-studio sounds vague, either, so I'll put that idea to a rest.

And please stop preaching about another project that has less people in its group.. I bet you haven't come any further than I did.

I don't even know what you're talking about. Stand down lapdog.

Dont try and take my guys,it ain't working and I'll need them. Go steal elsewhere

Yes I am talking to you pro.

Really bro? Really? Nah,man I'm starting something. Go preach elsewhere.

You haven't exactly left a good impression on me.

Yeah no,besides that,you just have a demeanor I don't like.

All right. Thanks Marslane.

Well i am not doing anything. You can only blame Pro-Soldier in it who is just massively inviting people to the Steam group. I am not in full support of that, but i can`t stop him either because he is not in our team.
I respect your choise of staying with GW:A and i would wish to see your GW:A project see daylight sometime in the future.
And yes the concern about "remake" is true. I am already changing the "remake of BF P4F" thing to "game inspired by BF P4F".
I really wish to keep good relations with you. If there are any problems in the future, then you can always contact me and we can discuss them.

@Marslane

Also realize, no one has actually left the group. We have the same amount of people. You just coming and poaching our people isn't right either. We had our thing, you had yours. Now I don't care what you did or how much you've advanced,the two groups were very distinct. So stop trying to ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ take our people.

Alright so they are. I'm not joining you. I still believe in this project and also, Tommy's right you're going into a hellfire by calling it a remake.

No they're not