Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem

N K K K K YS/K
N B B B BM N
YA
G
YA
N N K N K K N/YS
B B B BM
YA
G
YA
all my units are upgraded vets that are very expensive. Since we cannot determine what the next guy has how could I improve on this?
As for the merger.. is it a merge or absorbtion.. i.e are you losing station as clan leader and we all take orders from another?
1. We should merge with clans that are active and play fairly regularly.
2. Will we have a new logo, new clan name , specialization etc?
In terms of the clan competion, I think we should have 5-7 provinces as our base and expand out afterwards. We should also employ a system of attack-build policy. Some clan members attack provinces, others build on top of the newly captured ones. I think the Koreans were efficent at this process. If you noticed, each of their captured provinces had huge scores. Maybe Inania can assign attacking/building turns during the week.
All that work we put in and all gone...pfft. What a bunch of noobs we are plauying against. But, we will get em next time. Anyway as my drunk friend use to say "Failure is the cornerstone of success"