Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem

Ill still play the open world now and then, and when server things goes better try the FOB stuff.
As they have stated in multiple demos that you could both defend and visit your friend's FOBs, I can only imagine this will be possible with a later patch. If not, the group will still remain active, as we have MGO to look forward to.
It's that tension which makes the FOB system so interesting to me.
But I do think the way it works, as-is, is good enough. If you invade someone you should already be aware of how much of a risk it is.
I'm not going to boot people out if they decide to try it, though, since we don't know how targets are selected. You might get dropped in against someone in the group against your will, for instance. It doesn't seem very enforceable from my end, anyway. I'll let the natrual cycle of revenge be the moderator, unless everyone gets up in arms against one person who's only reason for joining was to get more target of oppertunity. If that happens, I'll make a post and we can decide what to do.